Studying the LPC without a training contract
Oliver chose to study the LPC despite not having secured a training contract.
He explains that this was a deliberate and informed decision. He believed that completing the LPC part‑time while working full‑time would demonstrate initiative and strengthen future applications. As he notes in the attached document, “I knew I didn’t have the best grades, and so I had to do whatever I could to differentiate from other training contract applicants.”
He emphasises that students must ensure they can fund the LPC before enrolling. At the time, he qualified for a postgraduate career development loan and encourages prospective students to research current funding options thoroughly.
Applying for training contracts
Oliver applied for training contracts during his undergraduate studies but acknowledges that he was not yet ready. He lacked experience and did not dedicate sufficient time to producing high‑quality applications. He advises prospective trainees to identify and address weaknesses early, ensuring that applications reflect genuine commitment and relevant experience.
Securing a first paralegal role
Oliver began working as a paralegal in 2014.
He recalls attending 4 or 5 interviews before securing a position and stresses the importance of requesting detailed feedback after each rejection. He asked interviewers about his CV, his answers and whether his examples aligned with what employers sought.
He encourages candidates to prepare thoroughly, understand the job description and use personal experiences to demonstrate transferable skills.
As he explains, “Just because you haven’t had previous legal experience doesn’t mean you don’t have the skills necessary to excel at a job.” Employers do not expect paralegals to perform advanced legal tasks on day one, so applicants should feel confident referencing non‑legal achievements that show organisation, teamwork or customer service.
Qualifying as a solicitor through equivalent means
Oliver qualified as a solicitor at DWF through the equivalent means process.
The opportunity arose unexpectedly. After receiving an offer for a training contract at another firm, he discussed his situation with his line manager and supervising partner. Together with the Learning and Development team, they explored the equivalent means route, which allowed him to remain at DWF while progressing toward qualification.
To begin the process, Oliver had to prepare a detailed business case for approval by senior partners. Once approved, he began compiling the portfolio required by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Understanding the equivalent means process
Oliver explains that the equivalent means route has evolved and encourages candidates to consult the SRA website for up‑to‑date guidance. At the time he qualified, the process allowed applicants to seek exemptions from:
- a qualifying law degree or equivalent
- the LPC
- the Professional Skills Course
- a period of recognised training
Oliver had already completed his LLB and LPC, so he sought exemption from the period of recognised training. He chose to complete the PSC voluntarily to enhance his skills and expand his professional network.
To obtain exemption, he needed to demonstrate at least 2 years of supervised legal experience and show that he had met the SRA’s Practice Skills Standards. He downloaded the exemption form, which required him to document his experience across areas such as case management, communication and application of technical knowledge.
He identified relevant matters using DWF’s case management system, wrote detailed explanations of the skills he applied, attached corroborating evidence and obtained supervisor references. Organisation was essential. He ensured that references and appendices were clearly cross‑referenced to make the application easy for the SRA to review.
He emphasises the importance of being concise and focusing on the SRA’s requirements rather than providing unnecessary background. As he notes, “Every trainee’s experience is different so it is expected that your application will be different.”
Additional exams
Oliver completed the PSC, which included one exam and a series of interactive workshops covering topics such as client care and mediation. He found the PSC manageable and beneficial for professional development.
Drawbacks of the equivalent means route
Oliver reports no drawbacks. He credits his supportive network at DWF for making the process smooth. He emphasises that the EMP requires self‑motivation, as candidates must take responsibility for documenting their experience and progressing their application.
The future: Will the SQE increase access?
Oliver believes that the Solicitors Qualifying Examination has the potential to widen access to the profession.
He notes that the shortage of training contracts has left many LPC graduates unable to qualify. Once fully established, the SQE’s qualifying work experience requirements may create a less prescriptive route and allow more candidates to qualify through alternative pathways such as equivalent means or solicitor apprenticeships.
Not sure how close you are to qualifying?
The path-fit quiz reads your situation and shows you which routes you are ready for, and exactly what to do next. Four minutes, no account needed to start.
Check your readiness