This content is being reviewed to make sure it’s current.

Articles › Guides › Guide

Guide · Guides

Tutor Strikes, University Responses and the Case for a Student–University Contract

Tutor strikes at the University of Edinburgh have drawn national attention following reporting in The Tab. While industrial action has disrupted marking and progression for students, much of the public debate has focused on how universities have responded. This article examines the causes of the strikes, the implications for legal education and whether a formalised contract between students and universities could reduce future disruption.

Why Are Tutors Going on Strike

Since 2018, university tutors across the UK have taken industrial action over pay and working conditions. Many report working significant unpaid overtime to support students. At Edinburgh, tutors stated they were paid for limited preparation time and that Guaranteed Hours did not cover assistance outside scheduled teaching. The University and College Union recommended a nationwide boycott of marking final‑year dissertations.

Student responses have largely focused on concerns about university decision‑making rather than criticism of tutors. Some students joined staff on strike in support of improved working conditions.

How Have Universities Responded

Edinburgh initially introduced temporary variations to marking processes. These included allowing students to graduate without a marked dissertation and calculating grades from existing assessments. Students who had spent months on dissertation work expressed concern about the impact on degree outcomes.

Reports indicated that the university saved money during periods of industrial action due to reduced marking costs. Students also raised concerns about progression into further study where final marks were required.

Edinburgh later announced provisional grades, similar to approaches used by other institutions. These grades would be updated once marking resumed. Student satisfaction scores at Edinburgh have declined, and uncertainty remains about when marking will be completed.

What Is the Solution

One proposed approach is a formalised contract between higher‑education providers and students. Academic commentary, including work by Kris Robbetts, has discussed the concept of student contracts. A contract between students and university administration could set out expectations around marking, support and academic processes.

Such a contract could include assurances that submitted work will be marked within defined timeframes and that students will receive clear information during periods of disruption. It could also outline student responsibilities, including attendance and submission requirements. A structured agreement may provide greater clarity for both parties.

How Have the Strikes Affected the Legal World

Delayed marking has affected students applying for graduate roles and postgraduate legal courses such as the GDL and LPC, where final grades are required. Unmarked dissertations also limit opportunities for student research to be published or used by practitioners. These delays may affect entry into the legal profession for some students.

Final Thoughts

The disruption caused by marking boycotts has raised questions about how universities manage industrial action and support students. A formalised contract could provide clearer expectations and reduce uncertainty. Continued dialogue between universities, staff and students will be essential to ensure academic processes remain stable during future disputes.

Built for routes like this one

Not sure how close you are to qualifying?

The path-fit quiz reads your situation and shows you which routes you are ready for, and exactly what to do next. Four minutes, no account needed to start.

Check your readiness
Free · no account needed to start